AnalyzeDirect Chow TW, Takeshita S, Honjo K, Pataky CE, St Jacques PL, Kusano ML, Caldwell CB, Ramirez J, Black S, Verhoeff NPLG. Comparison of manual and semi-automated delineation of regions of interest for radioligand PET imaging analysis. BMC Nucl Med. January 2007;7:2.
Full Text – Open Access
Publication Date
January 2007
How Analyze was Used
“Identification of 15 landmarks on the 3D-rendered T1 images (e.g., anterior commissure (AC), central sulcus) with ANALYZE software … yields a proportional Talairach grid of each individual’s eroded T1 images [Dade et al. 2004]. ”
Keywords
Brain Mapping/methods
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Observer Variation
Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
Reproducibility of Results
Software
Author Affiliation(s)
Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest, Toronto, Canada. (TWC, CEP, SB)
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. (TWC)
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. (TWC, NPLGV)
Department of Neurosurgery, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan. (ST)
Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest, Toronto, Canada. (KH)
Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, US. (PLST)
Departments of Medical Imaging and Medical Biophysics, Department of Medical Physics, University of Toronto and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada. (MLK, CBC)
Imaging Research, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada. (JR, SB)
Cognitive Neurology Research Unit, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada. (SB)
ID# 1780
Tags: Brain Mapping/methods, Computer-Assisted Image Processing, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Observer Variation, Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Reproducibility of Results, Software