AnalyzeDirect

Arisan V, Karabuda ZC, Pişkin B, Özdemir T. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-aided implant placement. Part II: reliability of mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. December 2013;15(6):907-917.

Publication Date
December 2013

How Analyze was Used
“Using a special software (Analyze, AnalyzeDirect, Lenexa, KS, USA), surface volumes of the planned and placed implants were fused in the three-dimensional environment by using a semi-automated fusion procedure, which utilizes a mapping protocol of the FOV.”

Keywords
Computed Tomography
Computer Assisted
Cone Beam
Dental Implants
Deviation from the Planning
Gray Density
Stereolithography

Author Affiliation(s)
Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. (VA)

Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. (ZCK)

Department of Prosthodontics, Gülhane Military Medical Academy (GATA), Center of Dental Sciences, Ankara, Turkey. (BP)

Department of Oral Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. (TÖ)

ID# 381

Tags: Computed Tomography, Computer Assisted, Cone Beam, Dental Implants, Deviation from the Planning, Gray Density, Stereolithography