Kim KK, Privitera MD, Szaflarski JP. Lessons learned from a comparison of language localisation using fMRI and electrocortical mapping: case studies of neocortical epilepsy patients. Epileptic Disord. December 2011;13(4):368-374.
Full Text – Open Access
Publication Date
December 2011
How Analyze was Used
“We utilised a 3D surface registration method (ANALYZE version 8.1…) to co-register the post-implantation CT image with high resolution T1-weighted 3D anatomical scans and with Z-maps of subjects’ fMRI results (all in native space).”
Keywords
Adult
Brain Mapping
Decision Making
Electroencephalography
Epilepsy/pathology/psychology/surgery
Epilepsy, Complex Partial/pathology/psychology/surgery
Female
Humans
Intracranial Pressure/physiology
Language
Language Tests
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Neocortex/pathology
Neurosurgical Procedures
Semantics
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
Author Affiliation(s)
Department of Neurology, Dongguk University International Hospital, Gooyang-shi, Kyeonggi-do, Korea. (KKK)
Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, US. (KKK, MDP, JPS)
Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, 260 Stetson Street, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0525, US. (KKK)
Cincinnati Epilepsy Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, US. (MDP, JPS)
Center for Imaging Research, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, US. (JPS)
ID# 847
Tags: Adult, Brain Mapping, Complex Partial Epilepsy/pathology/psychology/surgery, Decision Making, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy/pathology/psychology/surgery, Female, Humans, Intracranial Pressure/physiology, Language, Language Tests, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Neocortex/pathology, Neurosurgical Procedures, Semantics, Treatment Outcome, X-Ray Computed Tomography