Driscoll CL, Carlson ML, Fama AF, Lane JI. Evaluation of the hybrid-L24 electrode using microcomputed tomography. Laryngoscope. July 2011;121(7):1508-1516.
Publication Date
July 2011
How Analyze was Used
“Each specimen was scanned in two acquisitions, each requiring 8 hours at 35 kilovolts and 50 milliamperes. The two acquisitions were then combined and displayed using image processing software (Analyze® 9.0).”
Keywords
Cadaver
Cochlear Implantation/methods
Confidence Intervals
Electrodes, Implanted
Equipment Design
Equipment Safety
Female
Humans
Male
Odds Ratio
Prospective Studies
Round Window, Ear/surgery
Temporal Bone/surgery
X-Ray Microtomography/instrumentation
Author Affiliation(s)
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery & Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, US.
ID# 749
Tags: Cadaver, Cochlear Implantation/methods, Confidence Intervals, Ear Round Window/surgery, Equipment Design, Equipment Safety, Female, Humans, Implanted Electrodes, Male, Odds Ratio, Prospective Studies, Temporal Bone/surgery, X-Ray Microtomography/instrumentation