Allen MD, Johnstone J, Rice CL, Marsh GD. Differences in leg bone geometry in young, old and very old women. Eur J Appl Physiol. November 2011;111(11):2865-2871.
Publication Date
November 2011
How Analyze was Used
“All images were analyzed by the same investigator using ”Analyze AVW” Version 8.0 software. This program allows the calculation of cross- sectional areas of different tissues of each of the MR images.”
Keywords
Absorptiometry, Photon
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging/physiology
Bone Density
Female
Humans
Individuality
Leg Bones/*anatomy & histology/radiography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Male
Middle Aged
Organ Size
Sex Factors
Weight-Bearing/physiology
Young Adult
Author Affiliation(s)
School of Kinesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. (MDA JJ, CLR, GDM)
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. (CLR)
Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. (GDM)
ID# 798
Tags: Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged_80 and over, Aging/physiology, Bone Density, Female, Humans, Individuality, Leg Bones/anatomy & histology/radiography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Male, Middle Aged, Organ Size, Photon Absorptiometry, Sex Factors, Weight-Bearing/physiology, Young Adult