Analyze Publications Database

A comparison of a second- and a third-generation modular cup design: is new improved?

Powers CC, Ho H, Beykirch SE, Huynh C, Hopper RH, Jr., Engh CA, Jr., Engh CA. A comparison of a second- and a third-generation modular cup design: is new improved? J Arthroplasty. June 2010;25(4):514-521.

Publication Date
June 2010

How Analyze was Used
“To analyze the CT image, the DICOM-formatted image data were transferred to a personal computer for analysis using a computer-aided imaging program (Analyze 7.0).”

Keywords
Acetabulum/surgery
Adult
Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects
Biocompatible Materials
Female
Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Osteolysis/etiology
Polyethylene
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure

Author Affiliation(s)
Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, Alexandria, VI, US. (CCP, HH, SEB, CH, BHH, CAE Jr, CAE)

Inova Center for Joint Replacement at Mount Vernon Hospital, Alexandria, VI, US. (CAE Jr, CAE)

ID# 959

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,